Nice. Amazon gives you the option of ordering Kindle books now for delivery when you receive the device. That's actually dangerous.
Avatar

Szul

Vcard Download vCard   what is this?
Rss_icon

Recent Activity


Filter by:
All
  • Dharma Initiative Stations

    As much as I love Lost and the very character-driven nature of the entire epic, I have to say that the mystery surrounding the Dharma Initiative is by far my favorite aspect of the show. I wish the show had gone into much more detail about them. Hell I'd even support a Dharma Initiative spin-off series (off-Island) about mad scientists, corporate espionage and the mysteries of the universe.

    On Twitter I discovered a link to a guy's Flickr account that contained fully designed Dharma Initiative cards. This is probably the coolest fan art I've seen associated with the show. It almost reminds me of a Tarot deck.

    So enjoy... and throw your support behind this guy to encourage him to produce real cards or posters based on his designs.

    LOST Dharma Stations - series

  • Brief Thoughts on the Ending of Lost

    As I plan to go through all of the main plot points, mysteries, challenges, etc. in detail while re-watching the entire series, I'll only give some brief thoughts here. After all, such an epic ending to a roller-coaster show deserves some first impressions.

    Needless to say, the Lost producers proved me wrong in my assessment of the so-called "flash sideways." And although I would have preferred a "happily-ever after" in which all of our beloved characters enjoyed better lives (with brief memories of their Island time), the writers of the show remained true to the "constant" and their original interpretation of the physics of time - not creating an alternate timeline - and ultimately remaining true to "dead is dead."

    Lost had many flaws and the series finale was no different. There weren't really any answers to any long standing mysteries or questions. Only a few questions were answered and most of them were brought up this season. Also, I believe that the producers are clearly lying when they say that they planned this from the beginning. It's quite possible that they intended the entire Island itself to be purgatory, but when viewers guessed it almost immediately, they quickly decided to find a plan B. I think the writers themselves were lost for a while in a trying to find a more intelligent way to progress and end this show. They were trying to find a way to beat the Internet hooligans and bulletin board amateur scientists. Lost existed during a time when broadband access and social web sites started to skyrocket. Secrets are hard to keep now and the producers could only do so much to try to keep the audience guessing. This led to runaway plot points and mysteries will no real satisfactory ending. The producers painted themselves into a corner.

    With the Lost finale, all is redeemed. If you've watched it and you're still harping on mysteries, you've clearly missed what this show was all about. Does it suck not to have these mysteries answered? Of course. I'm a completest like many die hard fans. I'm also a polymath with a love for philosophy, religion, science and anything even remotely mysterious. But my disappointment in the lack of answers to these mysteries doesn't hinder my emotion connection to a fantastically bittersweet ending to a story that was always about the human condition.

    In the end, they all connected. In the end, they were all redeemed. It was sad. It was joyous. It was epic. They received in death that which they couldn't receive in life. They found each other. Despite their trials and tribulations - despite everything - people were forgiven. People were happy. It was the end. And it was perfectly OK. They could all let go.

  • Getting Real with 37Signals (and Rework)

    The Twitterverse was abuzz when 37Signals released their Rework book (complete with availability from Amazon.com, and even in the Kindle format). At first I refrained from listening to any hype; but with a quick glance at the back matter, I found myself a button click away from immediate Kindle satisfaction. Topics like "meetings are toxic" and "planning is guessing" hit pretty close to home with my previous job at Travel Tribe... so I clicked the button.

    I had actually owned 37Signals' previous book (Getting Real) for some time, but failed to crack open the PDF. With some spare time on my hands this go-round, I started to read through Rework on my PC before wrapping it up on my Kindle.

    Rework is a culmination of good, bad and ugly. It's not really a book. It's a collection of inspiring essays with the 37Signals team talking at you. The book is an extremely quick read filled with opinionated business talk, but most of it is well informed and very pragmatic. Many of the tenets are things that I've just been discovering just recently.

    Rework goes against the grain because the quality of writing is intentionally poor. It's not that the ideas are unclear. It's that the book wasn't written to be a business book that tops any charts. It's written as if spoken. It's written clearly and directly - straight to the point - and doesn't let business manual fluff (or proper writing style) get in the way.

    As a book of axioms, Rework hits a ground rule double. It might not score you any runs initially, but it'll at least advance the runners. It's up to your own hard work to bring them home.

    After reading Rework, I decided I liked it enough to finally give Getting Real a try. This was my mistake. As it turns out Rework is just Getting Real minus a few chapters, minus all the quotes, and rewritten so as to speak more directly in its prose. Rework is essentially a "reworked" Getting Real. This was disappointing to find out. I was able to glean a few pearls from the dropped material between the reissue, but for the most part, I was just reading something that had already been out for a while.

    Say what you want about 37Signals, but they've been able to build a successful business using their philosophy (which is found in these books). There is certainly a lot of "I wish we did things that way" in these books. Well, 37Signals has done it that way, and they've been very successful with their products, while Ruby on Rails has helped turn them into the golden children of web 2.0 programming. I recommend you forget about Getting Real and instead take an evening to read through Rework. If anything it's a fun look at what a successful small business thinks makes a successful small business philosophy.

  • Life Incorporated: The Secret of Individualism

    Chapter Four of Douglas Rushkoff's Life Incorporated is where things start to fall a little bit in disarray for me. Rushkoff begins by attacking the ideology of the Secret, but this is the same guy who wrote Club Zero-G as a graphic novel primer on the idea of designer reality. He's a man who believes that stories shape reality and we are ultimately the architects of our world. I'm no defender of the Secret by any means, but it's hard to be critical when so many of your own ideas support some of the same ideology.

    I don't think Rushkoff's gripe is with any system of designer reality. Really he's just bashing the marketers that are making millions off of cookie-cutter self-help exercises and cliches, while taking advantage of people who are looking for any means to build a better life for themselves. Rushkoff equates the Secret with the culmination of a society bent on self-promotion - on selfishness - while also exhibiting an inability to want to work for your "wants." I can agree with this wholeheartedly.

    Rushkoff goes back to the Renaissance to show the emergence of the individual out of the collective of the community. To him, this individualism is what corporations want people to seek out. To view yourself apart from your community is to seek out wealth, knowledge, etc. on your own, without concern for your neighbors. To Rushkoff, this divisiveness is a breeding ground for corporations to destroy local communities, while the individual turns a blind eye. It allows the corporation to supply a person's individual needs, while slowly making them another cog in the machine.

    From individualism to industrialism, Rushkoff shows how corporations from the dawn of the Renaissance have destroy a local sentimentality in favor of a corporate identity. The diminishing of local libraries, town halls and community centers (or at least the vacancy of them due to some other highly promoted, yet less locally interactive activity) allowed for industrialism to take root.

    "In the kinds of towns [Alexis] de Tocqueville visited, human relationships dominated the local economy. If you needed oats, you'd go buy them from the general store - just one step removed from the mill - or maybe even from the miller himself. If the oats were bad, you'd know where to find the man responsible. You knew his face and his wife's. His kids might have gone to school with your kids. If his oats were bad, he'd lose more than a customer, for you lived and worked in the same town as the miller. You might fix wagon wheels, or even work as the local chemist, mixing his wife’s medication. If you ate bad oats, you wouldn't be doing your job as well, either. The miller might end up with a dangerously assembled wheel or, worse, an incorrectly dosed prescription. If the miller supplied a bad product, he had more at stake than you business. You were more than just one another’s customers; you were interdependent members of a community.

    The Industrial Age brought factories capable of making oats faster and cheaper than the local miller could have ever imagined. (And where industry couldn’t succeed in creating economies of scale, lobbyists were sure to tilt the playing field in their favor.) So now, instead of buying oats from a human being you knew, you’d get them from a big factory several hundred or several thousand miles away. It would come in an impersonal big brown box. There was no miller to be seen."

    Instead of identifying with the makers of your products, you now identified with the brand. Your relationship to a brand took over for the lack of a relationship in a local economy. Mass marketing and mass production desocialized consumers, further separating them from their community - further solidifying an individual that was that much easier to divide and conquer from his neighbor.

  • Getting Rid of Things

    When I was younger I never threw anything away. This isn't to say I was a hoarder. I threw mostly useless shit away sure. But I was a collector (as in collectibles) so I had a lot of things that were collected. Maybe it was some OCD "everything in a line" problem. I liked to have the collection, complete the collection, and think that I'd never get rid of the collection. I had toy collections, comic book collections, sports card collections and more.

    On top of all of that, I was (and still am) an avid reader; I like to buy DVD's; and up until the digital age, I had a ton of CD's as well.

    Living on your own changes the way you perceive your "stuff." You want stuff, sure, but you also have to be aware of where you're going to put "stuff." This is the difference between hoarders and normal people who don't want to live in filth. You know you have a limited amount of space, so you have to evaluation the things you own and buy to determine what stays and what goes.

    Moving also changes the way you perceive your "stuff." When I moved out of my apartment and back in with my parents for two years (to recover from debt I let an ex-girlfriend put me in, and to help me save for a house), I realized that I had many more items than I thought I did. I was moving from a large apartment back into a single room in my parents' house, so things had to go. On top of that, I knew I was going to be moving again. Nothing sucks more than moving except moving twice - all the packing and lifting. I decided right there that I was going to throw a lot of stuff out and start over from scratch.

    I threw a lot out. This included dishes, a convection oven and furniture (given to a friend). The most important items that I threw out though were my CD's. These were important in a psychological sense.

    Until that point, my CD collection was an ever-growing space consumer. I had an iPod at the time, but "felt" that digital music just wasn't the same. Without that physical item in hand, it didn't feel real... or owned (or important). Furthermore, I may have had the music in a digital format, but I still wouldn't have had the cover art and CD insert. Those things were important to the entire "feel" of owning music weren't they?

    Moving changed all that. I decided that digital was the way to go, as I didn't want to move this large collection around to several places. I burned all the music I wanted to my computer hard drive and threw almost every CD out... and never looked back.

    I felt slightly liberated.

    Next came the move from parents' house into my own home.

    Once again, I felt the need to not have to move so much stuff. Despite everything that I trashed when I moved out of my apartment, I still had a ton of stuff (and a lot of collectibles). Most notably: 17 1/2 long boxes filled with comic books and 2 1/2 book shelves filled with books (not to mention books shoved into my computer stand, as well as inside of two closets).

    Twice I went through my book collection seeing what I really could do without. These books were either donated, recycled or simply thrown away. It was still tough to box up and move the remaining, but I whittled everything down to almost 2 1/2 book shelves worth (no more shoving books in closets). My comic books stayed at my parents' place for the time being.

    Once again, with books, I had that same feeling as with CD's: the physical ownership. I had bought a Kindle, which allowed me to eliminate most of my technology books, but eBook readers are still a ways off from duplicating the ease of navigation that a simple low-tech bound book has. But as I started to look at my cluttered office in my new 1,400 square foot home, I started to realize that I just wanted to live a less cluttered life. I've since gone through my book collection twice and am down to less than two bookshelves full of books, and another half bookcase that contains my trade paperback comic books.

    That brings us to my comic book collection. My house may be 1,400 square feet (a nice sized rancher), but I have no garage and no basement. In fact, I have very little storage space. What's more, I have a fiance. This means that I really just own the 8 x 8 room that consists of my office. The rest of the house is off limits.

    Something needed to be done. So I donated my comic books to Collectibles with Causes.

    Not all of them, but 13 long boxes full. Out of the 4 1/2 long boxes left, I sent a 1/2 long box (my Silver Surfer comics) to Brandon Whaley. I'm keeping the other four long boxes, but when I finally move them into my house, I'll be going through them as well (one last time) and will probably eliminate another box or two and donate them to charity, the local library or sell them on eBay.

    Honestly, I feel better for it all, and as time has gone by, I realize that I "need" less and less in life. At least, I no longer feel the need to "own" so much "stuff." It's a good feeling, and I'm seriously considering another round of eliminating books. We'll have to see if any of them have popped up in the Kindle store just yet.

  • War of Kings Hardcover

    Let's do another comic book review shall we? I've been backlogged like crazy. Some of it has to do with overworking. Some of it has to do with pure laziness. But hey! We have a new design for the web site, right?

    A few years back - right before the start of Annihilation: Conquest - I decided to give the Annihilation trade paperbacks a try. I wasn't buying any Marvel books at the time, but I always appreciated the cosmic stuff; and since I was getting back into the (non-Aquaman) superhero stuff, I wanted to play catch-up with some of my favorites.

    Annihilation blew me away. The sense of urgency and real danger for the characters in that storyline was amazing. Races were wiped out. Characters died. It was truly an epic story.

    With Annihilation: Conquest, I decided to buy the individuals issues; and although I loved to storyline (especially Star-Lord's mini-series), I realized that I enjoyed reading this cosmic fare in trade form more than monthly installments.

    War of Kings

    When War of Kings came around, I purposely stayed away from it in order to buy the trade. I was pleased when I saw that Marvel was packaging it up in an epic hardcover consisting of most of the story material (you still needed to pick up the War of Kings: Road to War of Kings trade paperback).

    There are essential two problems with War of Kings. The first is that Marvel already has monthlies of Nova and Guardians of the Galaxy; so those characters, although present, feel a bit disconnected from the larger story. They feel underused and slightly out of place as most of their involvement remains somewhat isolated in their own comic book.

    The second issue is chronology. The War of Kings hardcover really should have been collected in order of publication (in order of chronological events, actually). Otherwise, the War of Kings mini-series spoils the Darkhawk minis, while the Darkhawk minis spoil the War of Kings mini-series. Why more deluxe trades don't collect the story in chronological order is beyond me.

    The storyline itself is a collision of the aftermaths of the Skrull Invasion (for the Inhumans) and the Rise and Fall of the Shi'ar Empire (for the Shi'ar). With the involvement of the Shi'ar, the Starjammers and of course Vulcan, this story has a decidedly X-Men feel to it, moreso than a cosmic feel. It also seems to have lost some of the urgency that the previous cosmic events had delivered. Are we all "cosmic war'red" out? I don't know, but War of Kings definitely lost a step compared to the Annihilation events. This could also be a result of Nova and the Guardians being mostly in the periphery.

    I enjoyed the story, don't get me wrong; but something was missing - something that I hope returns in the sequel event Realm of Kings. In the meantime, Darkhawk fans should rejoice, as War of Kings clearly reinvents this 90's superstar into a solid cosmic piece of a grander puzzle. It does a good job trying to restore him to his glory years.

  • Project Superpowers: The First Year

    I'll be the first to admit that I was a little jealous of Project Superpowers when I first heard of it. After all, I had the exact same idea of grabbing some public domain characters and creating my own comic book universe out of them (so did many others apparently, including Alan Moore). Of course, I could never get the funding together to do so. My name isn't Alex Ross.

    Regardless (because irregardless isn't a word people), public domain is public domain, so it's fair game for anyone, and seeing Alex Ross and Jim Kruegar bring these old characters back to life is a great thing. Who doesn't love the golden age of comic books?

    Project Superpowers

    The first trade consisted of the entire collection of Project Superpowers Chapter 1, and I'm glad I read it all in one. The art is fantastic, as one would expect. The story? It was ok. The basic premise is that Fighting Yank was tricked into trapping all of his former colleagues into a magical urn in order to make the world a better place. Of course, the "better place" turns out pretty bad. The Fighting Yank is visited by the American Spirit and is told to seek out the Green Lama for help in finding the urn and setting their former allies free. Upon smashing the urn, heroes start popping up all over the world, and the Green Lama sets out gathering them up. There's ultimately a bit of intrigue and an ultimate showdown that concludes with the "Superpowers" taking over New York and setting up shop as the "watchmen" of the government.

    The story was good, but it wasn't epic. Considering the stories in other Alex Ross works (Kingdom Come, Earth X) I expected this one to be on more of a grand scale. The use of the urn was an interesting way to bring these heroes into the 21st century, but it seemed too contrived - especially since the urn also altered their powers to make them more 2.0 superheroes. On several occasions, I felt like characters were shoved into the story just so Project Superpowers (the company) can slap them with a trademark.

    Black Terror

    Which brings me to my ultimate gripe. I can understand copyrighting your material. These are original stories with definitive changes to the characters, but Project Superpowers has trademark notices on the titles and in the credits of the book. How exactly do you - in good faith - trademark something that's already in the public domain? My assumption is that they're trademarking the title logo design and the character design and NOT the actual usage of the names in comics. For example, I'm assuming that somebody could come up with their own Black Terror comic book and call it "Black Terror" without getting sued. After all, Project Superpowers didn't originate the Black Terror name, nor it's usage in comic books, so they shouldn't be entitled to a trademark on it. If they are, one would hope that they wouldn't be as repugnant as to sue somebody else using the name, considering that their claim to it is just by circumstance and exploiting loopholes. Regardless of the actual claim and right, it opens up a shady area of potential misunderstanding with other creators that wish to use public domain characters in their works - especially at the rate that Project Superpowers is jamming more and more public domain characters into their works (even if just for a cameo). Let's hope this isn't some sort of power play on Ross' part.

    Whereas Project Superpowers itself was so-so (entertaining, yet not thrilling), and the Death-Defying Devil trade was much of the same, the Black Terror trade paperback installment was absolutely fantastic. Incredibly intense and full of action and mayhem, Black Terror is so over-the-top it defies description. You can tell that the Project Superpowers creators fell in love with the character of the Black Terror because it feels like so much additional effort was put into the storyline in his own book. Despite the hype around the Project Superpowers maxi-series, it's this book that defines the universe as a whole. I'm interested in seeing how things evolve in the Chapter 2 maxi-series, but I'll be waiting for that one in trade as well.

    Overall, I think this is a great effort to bring new light to long lost characters.

  • Upgrading the Blog; Upgrading the Life

    I've disappeared for a while and most of it has to do with work. Well... not actually work, but instead a strange desire (more accurately a "false need") to accumulate more work in order to accumulate more money. Owning a house is a bit of a shock to the system, and I might have become overtly paranoid with hoarding cold hard cash. I've learned several things in this endeavor.

    1.) I hate consulting. The work itself is fun, and I love helping businesses out, but unfortunately in consulting you have to deal with people - each with their own agenda and potential ADD problem. I like product development much, much better.

    2.) I hate consulting. Did I already mention that? I like doing what I'm doing now, and I like working with who I'm working with. Occasionally, the company gathers a few outside consulting gigs, and I had taken it upon myself to use my people-person skills to make contacts, build relationships and pull in possible jobs. The problem is that what starts as "I have a lot of projects and would like to pass some to you" deteriorates into a situation where that person wants you to work for them. I'm not interesting in picking up a second job. If you want to shuffle work my way, great; but don't call me every day wanting phone calls, making statements of paired programming and acting like we work for the same company. We don't. I have a job.

    3.) Clients pretend they know what a functional specification is and what scope creep entails until they actually violate one or the other (more commonly both). I've always taken extra precautions with laying out what's going to be done. If you still end up being surprised, you really didn't read any of the material I sent over, did you?

    4.) A lot of people in technology suck. My current business partner will say that 98% of programmers can't program. Although I won't go that far just yet, there is a large demographic of programmers out there that truly can't program. They can build web applications sure. But not many have what it really takes to build a solid product or solution. I've worked on technology over the last 7-8 months whose very philosophy has impressed business people, CTO's and programmers all over. But most programmers will look at it and say "what the hell are you doing" or "you're overcomplicating things" or "we don't have time to do it that way." That's always been my favorite one: "no time." Most programmers - feeling pressured by their managers, or just lazy - often indicate that they don't have time to do something correctly; but they fail to realize that in the end, you'll spend more time on code maintenance in the next 6 months than if you would have just spent some more time coding it right to begin with.

    5.) I can't talk technology to technology people anymore. I can. But I can't get into details. I can appreciate technology and code, but the truth is, when I talk about what I'm working on most either think I'm out of my mind or love it, but claim they don't have time to do things that way (see number 4 above). And I'm not a code snob; but things like workflow, patterns, information architecture and business/solution-oriented product development is not the same as creating web forms. I zone out as soon as I hear someone start talking about PHP or standard web forms.

    In reality - just like all of the books I've been shedding (including donating almost my entire collection of comic books to charity) - I've been shedding projects and technological back-scratching. I have a focus now. I have a clear path and I've been working on some very cool stuff that has a clear pay-off in the future. This is all I need right now.

    But what's this about upgrading the blog you say? I've decided that any personal stuff I'm working on will be based in HTML5. Additionally, I need to utilize Python's path traversing better, package up miniature Django projects and drop them in a location that allows me to run different web sites off of these different mini-projects. This is something I should have done a while back, and I plan on getting around to it very soon... maybe while sitting in my new deck furniture on my newly stained back porch.

  • Giving Comic Books to Charity

    I became a steady collector of comic books in 1990. Before that, I had loved super-heroes, but lacking any steady place to pick up comics. It was always a few here and a few there. Over the last 20 years (with a short period of maybe 3 years when I had stopped collecting) I've amassed a huge collection of comic books. The problem is, I'm no longer a collector. I still love reading comic books, but I have no desire to store away every issue I can get my hands on in hopes of selling them for a large profit in the near future.

    When I bought my first home and moved to Virginia from New Jersey in September, I realized that I had no space for 17 long boxes filled with comic books. There was no climate controlled area in my home that was out of the way of people.

    Since I no longer had the emotional attachment to "collecting," I decided it was time to thin out the lot as much as possible. I'm keeping my Moon Knights and Aquamans. I'm keeping my Hellblazers. There is a decent amount of stuff that I'm still holding on to, but I seriously wanted (and needed) to drop as many as I could.

    What to do? I couldn't sell them. Most comic book stores that buy whole collections would offer about $500.00 ($1,000 if you're lucky) despite me having some good books from the pre-90's boom. I could list as much as possible on eBay, but that's just a pain in the ass.

    I wanted to do something that would benefit others. Maybe get some younger kids into reading comics, which would hopefully springboard them into books. You know... reading is fundamental, even though most kids don't read anymore. So I decided to donate the majority of my collection to charity. I found a really nice charity online. I'm just waiting for a call back.

    In the meantime, he's a snapshot of the collection:

  • Agents of Atlas: Turf Wars

    I've been on a collected editions kick as of late. I've gone back and re-read such Jim Starlin fare as the Infinity Gauntlet and his Silver Surfer issues (specifically his "Rebirth of Thanos" arc), as well as taking some looks at Alex Ross and Jim Kruegar's Project Superpowers. To top it all off, I finished up the first volume of Jack Kirby's Fourth World Omnibus as well. In between the reading of all that heady comics material, I've managed to squeeze in what's become a must-have book: Agents of Atlas.

    Agents of Atlas: Turf Wars

    Although I loved the first collected edition, this second volume shows Jeff Parker really hitting his stride. The quips are just that much more effective, and even when the action is slowed, the dialog keeps you entertained without missing a beat. The issues dealing with Atlas in Atlantis are prime examples of this. There really wasn't that much action (or at least action pertaining to the overall story arc), but the dialog won out, and the interaction between the different Agents was fantastically written. In limited issues, Parker has given a great deal of personality to his team. If Marvel was smart, they'd make sure that these Agents of Atlas are given a solid push in this whole "Heroic Age" that they're selling us on after Siege. Seeing Gorilla-Man in two of the Heroic Age promos so far gives hope.

    After dealing with underwater adventure, this volume really takes off when Jimmy Woo goes to war with a rival organization led by his former girlfriend - the daughter of the Yellow Claw. Parker goes the extra mile portraying a team that despite its obstacles can win with heart alone. The robot M-11 and his battles (and blow-ups) with the Jade Claw's more advanced robot are a prime example. In fact, the robot trash talking (especially when revealed as M-11 just humoring Gorilla-Man) was the highlight of the entire volume.

    I think the ultimate appeal of Agents of Atlas lies in its utilization of science fiction archetypes. As mentioned before, you have a talking gorilla, a mermaid, a goddess, a killer robot and a spaceman. These are primary archetypes in science fiction culture. Jimmy Woo, on the other hand, is the everyman that the reader relates too. This ensemble is a spectacular collection of everything that is right with science fiction... and Jeff Parker writes them perfectly.

    Despite this being the last collection of the regular series, Marvel has really been pushing Parker's work with this team. The Agents of Atlas have appeared in Thunderbolts and Incredible Hercules, plus they've had mini-series verses the X-Men and (currently) the Avengers (not to mention the Uranian mini-series). I'm just holding out hope that they stay on this kick and give this team a chance to catch on with more comic books fans.

  • The Alternate Timeline in Lost

    A lot of people think Lost jumped the shark last season when they began to incorporate time travel into their episodes. On the other hand, there are others that believe it jumped the shark way back in season three when Jack, Kate and Sawyer spent way too much time in the Others' village doing not much of anything. Although I won't point to a particular moment that I feel entails "jumping the shark," I will say that Lost has had its ups-and-downs like any show, and the writers have done a lot to battle theorists on the Internet - some of which has result in issues and complaints about red herrings, as well as anomalous story elements.

    Time travel in any movie or television show is often a problem for me. If time travel is the main element of the storyline, then fine, it can work wonderfully (The excellent Spanish film Timecrimes is a prime example of a mind-bending time travel tale). But in a storyline where time travel isn't apparent, introducing it can kill a story's appeal.

    When the Lost writers introduced time travel in season four, my first instinct was to cringe. Lost was such a great mystery that I didn't want all of its mysteries to be solved by way of time travel. To do so would be a deus ex machina that completely insults the intelligence and loyalty of Lost fans. Luckily, although they did use time travel to tie up a few mysteries - as well as wrap Locke's whole "chosen one" storyline - they left most of the mysteries intact (thus far). When the time travel "flashes" finally stopped - and dropped the castaways in the 70's during the Dharma Initiative - it offered a nice glimpse into the workings of the Dharma Initiative itself. Considering that we might not ever find out any more information on the Dharma Initiative in the show, this allowed us at least a little enlightenment on who they were and what they were about. It allowed us to forgive the time travel.

    Now we come to season six and the rumored alternate timeline. Well, according to last night's episode, the alternate timeline does occur. I'm against the use of the alternate timeline. I hate the idea. The whole idea of a "reset" means that all the character development is gone. All the emotional investment of the viewer is gone. It's not a good way to go... Or is it?

    There are two timelines occurring simultaneously. One of the timelines deals with Oceanic Airlines 815 landing at LAX with the island events never happening. In fact, they show the island sunk beneath the seas. The second timeline deals with the events following the death of Jacob, and Juliet smashing the nuclear warhead. These two seem incompatible. They seem that way.

    I have a theory which just might redeem this alternate timeline:

    Juliet succeeded in detonating the warhead; however, the detonation actually causes the "incident" and doesn't "reset" the timeline. Instead, the incident occurs, the plane crashes, etc., etc. This detonation - mixed with the electromagnetism and the island's "mysterious" properties then transports the castaways back to their original time of 2007 with fake Locke and the rest.

    This alternate timeline that we're watching actually has nothing to do with the nuclear warhead. What we're watching is a "reset" that will occur at the conclusion of the series. These events in 2004 are events that will show character development and "lessons learned in another life" to reestablish our emotional connection. Technically, these 2004 events are flash forwards in the continuity of the main story, even though they are occurring in 2004.

    I believe that at the shows conclusion something will occur that actually does reset time, and we will discover that these alternate timeline events are a continuation of that conclusion and continuity.

    Doing the story this way (if it's true) is very ballsy for the writers. I'm interested to see if they can pull it off effectively.

  • Life Incorporated: The Dissolution of the American Community

    Chapter three of Douglas Rushkoff's Life Incorporated is one that hits solidly home for me. Back in September I moved from the overcrowded state of New Jersey to the Western side of Virginia in the Shenandoah Valley - out to the country. Now I'm not that far from a metro-area. Harrisonburg (home to James Madison University) is 25 minutes away (with all it's strip malls and corporate stores). If I'm feeling especially adventurous, I can head over the mountain towards Charlottesville (home of Monticello and the University of Virginia), which would only take 45 minutes to an hour, depending on weather and traffic into the city. Both of these places are considered cities, but in reality they're well developed metro areas - smaller than Richmond and Roanoke. I get to enjoy these centers of commerce, but by living out farther in the valley I get to taste what traditional American life was like.

    The biggest impact my move had on me dealt with the mythological feel of rural American towns. There are large stretches of country between these towns, and even larger stretches between metro areas. You can travel 10-15 minutes (sometimes longer) without seeing much civilization. When you do, it's like traveling back in time. Random small buildings have nothing of note outside except old style Coca-Cola or RC Cola signs. Each town seemed to have a Tastee Freez (made famous by John Mellencamp) at some point. Downtown areas looked like miniature cities with maybe 5, 10 or perhaps 15 two story buildings tightly packed together. It was like I journeyed away from a corporately run and soulless New Jersey to finally find the heart of America - in all its myth and legend.

    Unfortunately, the visual escape was nothing more than visual. Many of the franchised Tastee Freezs are gone with their buildings sold to other businesses. Those Coca-Cola and RC Cola signs are antiques attached to closed buildings that don't sell much of anything anymore. Meanwhile much of these towns downtown areas lack any real business - just empty stores.

    In Elkton, Virginia an old movie theater sits abandoned not far from an empty grocery store that used to be locally owned. Although businesses exist in its downtown square, the area isn't nearly as bustling as it used to be. Locals tell me that 10-15 years ago, it would take you nearly 20 minutes to drive through downtown and loop back around - too many people out walking and carrying on. Today is a different story.

    The community feel still exists in these small towns, but much of it is peppered with trips to Harrisonburg, or the Walmart twenty minutes away. But these aren't communities that have given up on their personal touch. These are places that have been beaten down by corporatism. These are local, family-owned and community-supporting businesses that get crushed under corporate prices, eventually leaving a formerly self-sufficient town dependent of corporations to feed, clothe and entertain them.

    In the third chapter of Life Incorporated, Rushkoff talks about the destruction of these American communities that effectively desocialize individuals in an almost divide and conquer way to make us slaves to a corporate run society. The community and social feel of the American culture - still slightly evident in the Virginia towns that I travel - has been replaced by a "New Urbanism" warped by corporations in an attempt to usurp that American myth and turn it into a commodity, an environment that can be used for marketing purposes. He uses Birkdale, North Carolina as an example - a corporate built and sustained town that on the surface looks like Old Town America, but beneath is nothing more than a corporate sponsored experiment.

    The American dream is being replaced with the corporate motto. Corporations have declared war on the American community and are destroying that which they cannot receive an ROI from. This will result in American towns being dependent more and more on corporations for their needs and sustainability - an entire American populace at the mercy of a corporate greed that is just looking for more cogs to keep the wheels spinning.

  • Maya Cosmogenesis 2012

    Let me start this review by praising John Major Jenkins for his intense scholarship and dedication to the Mesoamerican culture. If there's one person who should be consulted in any effort to understand or speculate on the various cultures of Central and South America, it is he. Jenkins' opinion is highly thought out, scientifically tested and comes with a solid passion for the material. In many ways, he is more qualified than those scholars that walk around teaching the very same subject matter.

    In fact, it's Jenkins' lack of tied-down scholarship (the political end of it) that allows his theories to branch out into the mythological - and even somewhat mystical.

    Maya Cosmogenesis 2012 was a book that I've had on my shelf for a long time. I finally got around to reading it after a few years of procrastination; and although the book itself is a marvel, I was very much disappointed in the end result.

    This book is nearly 400 pages of pure content, but unfortunately Jenkins' concluding theory is less than six pages long. I bought the book expecting a theoretical examination of the Mayan end date, but mostly I found the book to be an examination of the Mesoamerican astronomical practices. Jenkins' does a phenomenal job of offering evidence that the Mesoamerican people were extremely advanced in their astronomy and understanding of the cosmos, but he offers little information of just what the significance of the 2012 date actually might be. What he does offer is a conclusion more likely to be found in a New Age book rather than a scientific inquiry.

    To Jenkins' defense, hearing a 2012 theory that is not doom-and-gloom, but instead offers a brighter outlook is refreshing to say the least. It just seems out of place in a book whose primary focus in its almost 400 pages has been mathematical, calendrical and cosmological. The picture he paints of these star-obsessed ancients is one of intelligence and purpose. His passive conclusion seems to be out of character for such a culture working off of definitive knowledge and in a highly active manner to harmonize with this cosmology (such as their various complex rituals and human sacrifice games).

    Ultimately Jenkins' research also reveals a false misconception with 2012. The galactic realignment placing the Sun in conjunction with the center of the Milky Way (and the possible black hole existing therein) actually will not occur according to his evidence. Instead the Sun barely touches the bottom edge of the "dark rift" that it's supposed to align with. Jenkins dismisses this fact, believing that the proximity is enough for the Mayans to be right, but it does offer some opposition to the theory.

    Jenkins' balances nicely his scientific evidence with an examination of Mesoamerican mythology and mysticism, and even goes out on a limb to speculate on the "powers" of shamanism and their control and access of cosmological principles. All of this builds a solid foundation, but ultimately his theory isn't as fleshed out as one would have expected given the evidence. But once again to Jenkins' defense, if the Moon affects people through its manipulation of water (which gives some credence to other heavenly bodies having an affect - hence astrology), then the possibility of this galactic alignment having an impact on consciousness is highly plausible. I just wish Jenkins gave us more in his theory than he did.

  • Life Incorporated: How to Make Millions in Marketing without a Real Business

    As I mentioned many moons ago, I intend to go over Douglas Rushkoff's book Life Incorporated, piece-by-piece. I'm a little behind where I intended to be, but it's not like his ideas or observations are going to be outdated any time soon. An examination of chapter two of his book makes this fact very clear.

    The second chapter is one to use as a rallying cry for anyone opposed to predatory practices of certain marketing schemes. Rushkoff introduces us to people whose credit and equity have all but dried up, but who quickly charge up their credit cards trying to buy "systems" to make themselves wealthy. The irony that many of the people sitting and listening to seminars on how to take advantage of the failing housing market are people who are in danger of losing their homes because of these same marketing and speculative tactics is not lost on Rushkoff. The psychology of the sell that these human infomercials spit out is a clear indication of the sickening nature that marketing in America has taken just so people can make a quick buck.

    I remember a commercial on television once (I forget what it was for), which parodied those late night infomercials about making money almost in your sleep. The slick guy in the chair looks at the camera and proclaims "Just send $50.00 for my book 'How to Get People to Send You $50.00 for a Book.'" It's funny, but sad at the same time, since this truly is what quick buck marketing does. And the Internet has made it worse.

    It's not just the Internet though. Even business books are getting ridiculous. Books that are supposed to be about creating start-ups or micro-ISV's or getting out in the world of consulting end up being nothing more than a book filled with common sense material and pages of interviews with already successful business people (who seem to be selling a product that relates to improving your business). If I didn't know any better I'd say that the interviewee paid for being interviewed so they could hock their product or service. It's a sad, sad thing. And I'm not even talking about the so-called business books in the "start your own business" section of the bookstore. I'm taking about the real business section and even the technology section (books published by O'Reilly and Apress).

    A friend of mine once got involved with Primerica. Since he was my friend, I was obligated to help him out by sitting in on a meeting. The man in charged asked me if I knew anything about the program. I jokingly told him I heard it was a pyramid scheme. He was slightly offended, but took it in good humor. During his speech he went on about the program telling about how people make money (at one point even drawing a pyramid on the blackboard. Hmm...). He then made sure to mention that people don't get paid for bringing others into the program because that! (he exclaimed coming over to me) would be a pyramid scheme. I'm sorry, but if you have to explain to me how your program is not a pyramid scheme; guess what? It's a pyramid scheme - no matter what the law defines. Luckily my friend only got suckered into investing into one of their life insurance policies. He soon got out of the whole game very quickly.

    It is indeed a sad state of corporatism that we see in America every day; and the economic crisis seems to have done little to affect the corporations' actions or the actions of those using squeeze marketing tactics to prey on peoples' dreams. People need to realize that there aren't any get-rich-quick ventures - just get-rich-quick programs designed simply to abscond with your money; and chances are, the people making money off of you never made any money off of the very program that they're selling. It's all in the sell - not the substance.

    I emailed Rushkoff recently about these same points and he concurred, concluding that:

    "The people making money in business today are the people telling others how to make money - mostly through marketing."

    "It's end stage capitalism. Truly end stage."

  • Agents of Atlas: Dark Reign

    In lieu of my edict to not post television show reviews until a certain concept or arc can be reviewed in whole, you'll also notice that I haven't been posting comic book reviews either. There's a two-fold reason for that. For one, most of my comics are ordered from Midtown Comics, and unfortunately I keep getting them later and later as the weeks go by. This doesn't bode well for timely reviews. The other reason? I felt that my short descriptive reviews were getting a bit repetitive. I was praising the writing of Mighty Avengers, while flushing James Robinson's writing skills down the toilet (plus bitching about the lack of any real story in Blackest Night). This was getting tiring for me. If you want to hear me bitch and moan and occasionally praise some comic book issues, follow me on Twitter. Otherwise, this blog will now review comic books based on story arcs or hardcover/trade paperback collections.

    Now let's talk about a gorilla, a robot and a space boy.

    I didn't read the original Agents of Atlas series from a few years back, so when I read the Atlas story in Dark Reign: New Nation, I didn't really care for it. It contained a bunch of characters I've mostly never heard of, and I was already tired of the inference that Norman Osborn was going to be the villain in every single Marvel book.

    Here we are a year later, and after several of my Twitter friends kept praising Jeff Parker's work on Agents of Atlas, I decided to pick up the first hardcover collection and give it a try.

    First let's talk about Jeff Parker. I didn't even know this guy wrote comics. I ended up following him on Twitter because I thought he was just a fellow comic fan. I didn't realize until a few month later that he actually wrote them too. Parker is a great person to follow on Twitter. Why? He actually communicates with people. And by people I don't mean a select circle of fellow comic writers while ignoring the thousands of fans following him. Parker communicates like a normal person on Twitter, and seems to actually try to respond to fans and friends alike. That's rare for this Twittersphere.

    Now let's talk about Agents of Atlas. We have a gorilla, a robot, a space boy, a goddess, a mermaid and a former FBI guy. I'm seriously unsure why I ever doubted this concept. These are golden age characters in a new light and Parker does several things right.

    First, they're good guys leading a group of bad guys, while pretending to be bad guys in order to do good. You still following me? Instead of fighting Osborn, they pretend to partner up with him in order to work the inside angle. It's definitely refreshing when compared to the rest of the Dark Reign tie-ins.

    Next, Parker mixes his current tale with flashbacks to the 50's to keep that golden age feel going. It gives us much needed back story about this teams exploits, and the flashbacks directly tie into the main story, allowing us a broader look at this team.

    What's great about this title is that it doesn't try to be too deep or too "meta" with its stories. The robot is a robot. The goddess acts like one. Namora acts like her cousin. The gorilla is the comic relief (as he should be). The Uranian, meanwhile, is the typical brains of the operation. This isn't to say that Agents of Atlas is filled with cliches. It's more a homage with high quality writing. Parker has done a fantastic job and hopefully Marvel will continue to support these characters so that other comic book readers - who might have dismissed them at first - start to catch on.

  • Darwin, Intelligent Design and Politics

    The absolute best part of Jonathan Wells' Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design is the quote on the front cover from Ann Coulter: "Annoy and godless liberal; buy this book!" Coulter is the Howard Stern of political conservatism. I probably disagree with about 90-95% of what she says, but she's always fun to listen to. You have to appreciate political bluntness. It's so rare today.

    As a disclaimer, this book was selected for the Conservative Book Club and Wells is a fellow at the Discovery Institute (or at least was at the time of the books publication), which is a non-profit conservative think tank that backs intelligent design.

    As another disclaimer, I don't really align myself as conservative or liberal. When it comes to politics, I like to think that I'm a fiscal conservative, but a social liberal. In addition, I believe in God, but I believe in tolerance towards other beliefs, so I think that the separation of church and state is a good thing - something meant to preserve religious freedom and avoid persecution. I don't personally believe in abortion, but I would never overturn Roe versus Wade. I'm registered as a Democrat, but that was mostly so I could vote for Obama in the primary over Hillary Clinton.

    I've laid that out on the table because I'm not some type of ultra-conservative that attempting to ram God down anyone's throat, and I don't wish to be accused of it later. I simply wish to give a fair review to Wells' book on a controversial subject. It may be a "conservative" book, but that doesn't make all of it's readers conservatives.

    Wells is both a biologist and theologian - having Ph.D.'s in both fields - and while his point is clearly to support intelligent design over Darwinism, he gives enough of a background on Darwinism, evolution, the history of science and critiques of intelligent design, that you really get the feeling that he's attempted to give you enough scientific results and battling dialectic to actually allow you to make an informed opinion.

    Wells does get repetitive in his denouncement of Darwinism, and reuses several phrases to try to ground in his point. He also attempts to create new pop culture words out of Darwinism such as Darwinspeak and "to darwin" in an attempt to put a black mark on Darwinism as a whole. His bias does show through. There's no denying it. But like any good scientist, Wells has enough evidence to support his conclusion. He draws on countless examples, name drops, controversies and philosophical theories in an attempt to sway the reader, and he does quite a convincing job of it.

    There are two branches to this book: the argument against Darwinism and the argument for Intelligent Design. The author does a good job of covering these, but occasionally blurs the line between the two as if they are one and the same. One should be careful to note that this is not the case.

    Perhaps the most interesting part of Well's book lies in its examination of the politics involved in the intelligent design controversy. To read about Darwinists scrambling to discredit scholars, remove them from positions and place injunctions against organizations for holding conferences was a real eye opener towards the actual intolerance that scientists are starting to develop. They're becoming similar to the same people that persecuted Darwinism in the first place. Scientific intolerance inhibits scientific advancement, and unfortunately the scientific communication has become more about politics than honest research.

    Wells' Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design - above all - is a well-researched tome detailing the controversy. His obvious bias leads him towards an Intelligent Design conclusion, but one can't say that he doesn't back up his conclusion with convincing evidence and true scientific and philosophical research. I normally stay away from "guide" books, but credit must be given to Wells for putting out such a refined piece of research - whether you agree with Intelligent Design or not.

  • In Search of Quetzalcoatl: Pierre Honore and the Cretans

    Everybody loves a good apocalypse meme. That's why the 2012 one is so popular right now. The millennium came and went without even a harrowing Y2K glitch, so we have to hitch our self-destruction and self-loathing onto another upcoming event. 2012 just happens to be that event.

    A while back I finished reading Daniel Pinchbeck's 2012: The Return of Quetzalcoatl. Though I have mixed feeling about the book, the cultural examination was fascinating, and I wanted to learn more. While shopping at a local Borders store, I found a book entitled In Search of Quetzalcoatl purporting to know the true identity of this god that is reaching back into popular culture - this "white" god. I bought it.

    It took me a while to pick up the book the first time, and about midway through I put it down. I almost succumbed to Timothy Ferriss' rule of if a book isn't interesting you, stop reading it. I fought off that inclination and continued reading it several months after first putting it down.

    It wasn't that Pierre Honore's book wasn't interested. It was that it was written very academically, but not very much too the point. I can deal with academic dryness. But early on Honore professes to know the identity of the white god Quetzalcoatl and then spends the remainder of the book painstakingly drawing comparisons throughout central and South America to show links between all of these civilizations. It isn't until the end that he presents us with his hypothesis, and the comparative research really only shows links between these early American civilizations. It doesn't necessarily support his conclusion.

    The book is well researched. Honore does an excellent job of gathering his research and laying it out on the table. I thoroughly enjoyed his hypothesis and believe that it is a valid argument. There are a few problems with it, however.

    First, it's published by Adventures Unlimited Press. I have nothing against this publishing company. In fact, they publish a lot of books that I would find myself reading. I love the strange, mysterious and supernatural. But when you place advertisements in Honore's book for other books on Atlantis, Lemuria, UFO's, time travel and anti-gravity, it loses a bit of its academic appeal. It draws into question the research in a guilty by association way.

    The next problem is that Honore relies too heavily on the notion that two civilizations couldn't possibly come up with the same thing independently, so therefore there must be a link. Although this may be used to come up with a valid argument on paper, it is not a sound premise, and draws into question some of the more vague links.

    Finally, Honore's concluding chapter tells us of his experiences searching for these specific rock carvings that he had read about. It's a first person account of him retracing a previous author's steps into the jungle, bearing hardships, and ultimately finding his prize. The problem is Honore came back with nothing. No photographs. No etchings. No rocks. He claimed that the rocks were under water, so he couldn't get any pictures of them. He claimed that the water sub-sided every ten years. Honore's book was written in 1961. Correct me if I'm wrong, but there has been no additional findings to support this.

    And what was Honore's conclusion? Who was the white god Quetzalcoatl? Honore hypothesized that the South American cultures were directly linked to expeditions from Crete - the island in Greece - and that these civilizations owe a lot to the Minoan civilization of the Old World. He presents evidence of white Indians in South America, as well as depictions of bearded men in carvings and other artistic endeavors. Honore's hypothesis is definitely thought provoking, and as I stated early, his book is well researched. The possibility exists that his hypothesis is true, but this book gives little hard evidence beyond similarities to sway one's skepticism.

    As an interesting side note, while I'm reading Honore's book and it's references to the Pontic Migration of Robert Heine-Geldern, I was also reading the essay "Ocean Origins of Indian Civilization" by N.S. Rajaram, which appears in the Disinformation anthology Underground!, and which refutes any European or Aryan influence on Indian (Southeast Asia) culture and civilization. I'm beginning to wonder if we'll every pinpoint the origins and migrations of humankind.

  • Writing Less to Write More: No More Reviews

    Well... not all reviews are getting canned from this blog. I've decided that too much of my time during the week (when I actually get time to blog) ends up going towards reviewing television episodes of Dollhouse and Fringe. Now I enjoy writing those reviews, but too often I feel obligated to make sure I get those out, even if I have a better blog post on the burner.

    Furthermore, the reviews often end up being short thoughts since usually, only a small portion of each episode releases information on their mythology-based subplots. This means that only minute pieces from episode to episode spurn any creative philosophical thinking on plot points. I feel that because of this, I'm not giving enough of a solid critique.

    As a result, I'll no longer be posting "per episode" reviews of any shows. Instead, I'm going to lump those reviews into a "themed" review. This means that I'll be writing reviews when I feel that the television series warrants it, and those reviews will focus on a piece of the mythology or narrative to examine some of the philosophical aspects of the series.

    By doing reviews like this, it'll not only increase the quality of the reviews themselves, but it'll also allow me more time to focus on writing about philosophy and other important areas of critique.

  • Imagine Your Reality Interview about Technology and Social Media

    My good friend Taylor Ellwood of Imagine Your Reality (a business and social media coaching company) was nice enough to interview me for his radio show on Blog Talk Radio. We spent about an hour talking about technology, social media and the services of my new company Overmortal. My headphones and microphone made me sound a little distant - and my dog barks for no reason at certain points - but the interview went well, and we covered some important topics.

    Get Flash to see this player.

  • Dollhouse: The Public Eye and The Left Hand

    This show has been officially cancelled... and that's a shame. No, this isn't Joss Whedon's best work, but this showing has become very entertaining, and in a world where most sci-fi drama's follow a specific script, Dollhouse continues to offer surprises around every turn.

    The genius is in the pacing. Whereas many mythology-driven shows only have a handful of secrets and continue to dwell on and manipulate those mysteries, Whedon is quick to reveal things in Dollhouse that other shows would take seasons to reveal. He's not afraid to change up the expectations. The character growth of Paul Ballard is evidence of this.

    This review is for two episodes, as they were continuations of one another and both aired on Friday night. I'm not sure if this will be the case with next week's two episodes.

    After a Senator reveals that he's gotten former doll November to testify before a Senate hearing about the supposed Dollhouse, the team begins to investigate the Senator - especially after the Rossum Corporation stays Adelle's hand and tells them that everything is under control.

    They suspect the Senator's wife of being a doll, so they send Echo in the guise of a prostitute to gain blackmail evidence from the Senator, while Ballard attempts to rescue November. The tables turn however, as the Senator realizes that Echo is a doll and decides to take her with him to see his wife, and when Ballard attempts to use a new mind-wipe device on the Senator's wife... it doesn't work. It turns out the Senator is a doll!

    While Ballard escapes his fate with the D.C. Dollhouse, Echo and the Senator go on the run as they begin to experience memory downloads. The Senator begins to realize that his marriage is a sham, while his mind has been manipulated to get him into a Senate seat for the Rossum corporation. Eventually they are both captured and brought to the D.C. Dollhouse where we meet... Summer Glau!

    Turns out Summer Glau plays Bennett, the D.C. Dollhouse's resident genius and counterpart to Topher. She is seriously mentally disturbed from a traumatic experience involving Echo, which left one of her arms useless due to neurological damage. I'm also pretty sure she's autistic.

    Adelle and Topher infiltrate the D.C. Dollhouse, but not before Bennett let's Echo and the Senator escape. While Topher and Bennett work together with their mind maps to try to bring the two dolls down remotely, Bennett turns the Senator into an assassin and tries to get him to kill Echo.

    Topher knocks out Bennett and then calls up himself (he put his own personality into Victor so that they could work together) to try to fix the situation. After a chase scene between the Senator and Echo, the Tophers eventually succeed, but not before the Senator kills his fake wife.

    Left grief stricken, the Senator stays awaiting the Dollhouse, while Echo flees. Though the events are never shown, it's pretty clear that he surrenders himself, allowing them to mind wipe him. When he appears late at the Senate meeting, he reveals that his wife is dead (the result of a car bombing) thanks to competing pharmaceutical companies attempting to bring down Rossum. He says that there is no Dollhouse and that November is seriously disturbed. In the end, it looks like the Rossum Corporation just created themselves a presidential candidate.

    The second episode ends with November a prisoner of the D.C. Dollhouse and Echo out in the world on her own.

    This was a great two-part episode that clearly showed character development and some trademark Whedon humor (with the two Tophers). Again, it's a shame this season is the end of the road for Dollhouse.

  • Fringe: Snakehead

    Every once in a while you need a good episode that plays off of a classic science fiction theme. This is that episode. Borrowing pretty liberally from James Cameron's Alien movies, this episode of Fringe finds the team investigating a crashed freighter with illegal immigrants that had giant hook worms bursting out of their stomachs (up through their mouths however - not actually through their stomachs).

    This was another non-mythology episode, which is a pretty good break between the mythology heavy August episode and the forthcoming episode about the hybrid "messiah." Much of the character development focuses on Walter's attempt to be more independent, as he further adjusts to life outside of the mental institution.

    As far as mysteries and sub-plots, this episode really didn't have many. It was a straight science fiction tale with a little father-son bonding at the end. Hence the short review today. In the end, the good guys get the bad guys, after a little drama with Peter almost becoming an incubator for one of these worms. It was one hour of good clean fun.

    Fringe has continued to get better and better this season. The show walks a fine balance between its mythology and its character development, making it on par with Lost in that regard. However, Fringe gets to learn from many of Lost's mistakes, so as long as Fox stands behind it when it comes to the rating problems (problems that are really a result of it sitting in an extremely competitive time slot), this show will blossom in much the same way that the X-Files did.

    Let's keep our fingers crossed.

Next page